Tuesday, February 10, 2009
I have to say that this ad doesn’t appeal to me at all, which is exactly what Nike wanted. It has a target audience and I’m not in it. To me it’s boring and really doesn’t capture my attention since I’m not a runner and not in the market to buy running shoes any time soon. If I saw it in a magazine I’d probably glance over it and turn the page without giving it a second thought. The fact that I could never run long distance probably has a lot to do with how I feel about running in general. Getting people who aren’t in the target audience to largely ignore the ad and not get upset, offended, or confused by it is a good marketing strategy. It allows the company to say exactly what it wants to say directly to its target audience.
The product is designed for runners but the audience for this ad is narrower. The target audience seems to be current costumers who have bought running shoes from Nike before. The phrase “old and the same” is used because Nike wants its current (and satisfied) customers to know that this shoe has whatever they liked about Nike’s other shoes. “New and improved” reassures them that this shoe is better than what they made before and it also convinces them that they should buy it.
The juxtaposition of words that are the opposite of each other (new and old, improved and the same) is a play on the idea that people like what they have and don’t want to change (or buy something else), yet always want something new and better. This appeals to all of the potential buyers Nike is targeting. I’m probably not the best judge of what a runner likes or wants in a shoe, but this ad seems like the target audience would like it.
The product is designed for runners but the audience for this ad is narrower. The target audience seems to be current costumers who have bought running shoes from Nike before. The phrase “old and the same” is used because Nike wants its current (and satisfied) customers to know that this shoe has whatever they liked about Nike’s other shoes. “New and improved” reassures them that this shoe is better than what they made before and it also convinces them that they should buy it.
The juxtaposition of words that are the opposite of each other (new and old, improved and the same) is a play on the idea that people like what they have and don’t want to change (or buy something else), yet always want something new and better. This appeals to all of the potential buyers Nike is targeting. I’m probably not the best judge of what a runner likes or wants in a shoe, but this ad seems like the target audience would like it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
On the contrary, this ad appeals to me because I am a runner. However, I have not been using Nike shoes for my entire running career where the slogan proves to be false for me. I personally have not used the old version of the shoe, so it is hard to determine how "improved" they have become.
ReplyDeleteI do agree with you, that is only directed at a very limited audience: Runners. It could potentially hurt Nike when trying to grab the attention of new customers, because the ad is clearly directed to those who have been using the shoe before it was modified. However, I feel that they are not trying to appeal to new customers, they just want to maintain their loyal customers and show them that they have improved it just for their use.
I do think it is an effective advertisement due to the simple word choice for the slogan. The structural balance of the sentence seems to work with juxtaposing the two statements statement. What the advertisers are trying to conclude is that these two products (the old version of the shoe and the new) are similar but different, demonstrated by using the figure of speech contrarium.
It is interesting to look at this statement because many figures of speech are being used to appeal to this particular audience. Not only is it juxtaposing the two points, but the statement is an oxymoron and a paradox. The statement completely contradicts itself, but yet it works because it is the same product, just two versions.
In terms of space, the ad was incredibly successful. They were able to get their point across in a very limited amount of space.
As a consumer and kind of a member of the targeted audience, I think this ad was overall effective and would make me want to continue using the product. I think it is reassuring knowing that they are thinking of their loyal customers.